Some very good news from Sacramento (and since good news from that part of the world is rare these days, let's celebrate it). Assembly Member Tom Ammiano has a bill that would eliminate the mandatory felony charges for marijuana cultivation and allow district attorneys to charge some pot farmers with misdemeanors. And it's cleared committee and is headed to the Assembly floor. The Bay Citizen has a decent wrapup on the politics (including the fact that the prison guards union isn't going to like it -- less customers).

It's likely the Senate will go along with the bill, too -- particularly since most of the district attorneys in Pot Country are supporting it. Mendocino DA David Eyster is the main sponsor. His colleagues in Humboldt, Del Norte and Lake Counties are all on board.

Oddly enough, the California District Attorneys Association still opposes the bill. The board of this august group seems to be dominated by the more conservative counties, but still: The DAs who have to deal with this issue regularly all want the bill passed. What's up with that? Well, the spokesman for the group, Cory Salzillo, told me that the bill "send the wrong message with controlled substances generally" and that it would also give not only a prosecutor but a judge the ability to turn a potential felony into a misdemeanor. "We're concerned about that judicial discretion," he said.

Which seems, frankly, a little nuts -- again, the four DAs who are most involved in charging people for cultivation of marijuana -- the folks on the front lines, so to speak -- want the bill to pass. So who decided the association position?

Salzillo says there's a legislative committee, but since this one was controversial, it went to the full board. And guess what? There's a San Francisco rep. on the board -- Assistant D.A. Jerry Coleman. I called him to ask how the vote went down. Here's our conversation:

Me: Hi, Mr. Coleman, I understand you're on the board of the California DAs association and I wanted to talk to you about why that group is opposing the Ammiano marijuana bill, which the DAs of the north counties that deal with the issue all support.

Coleman: "I'm not the spokesman for that association."

Me: Yes, but you're on the board and I'm wondering if you voted in favor of opposing AB 1017.

Coleman: "I can't give you an answer to that. I won't discuss any vote. I don't remember this one, but if I did I wouldn't talk to you about it anyway."

That was helpful.

Meanwhile, where's Coleman's boss, the San Francisco DA, George Gascon? This is a city that supports medical marijuana, has perhaps a few growers living in its city limits -- and if I had to guess, about, maybe, 93 percent of the voters would agree that marijuana cultivation shouldn't be an automatic felony. Why isn't Gascon's name on the list of supporters?

I dunno. His office hasn't called me back. I'll let you know when they do.