Gee, thanks Kamala

|
(3)

After ducking the issue for more than a week, Attorney General Kamala Harris has finally weighed in on the feds crackdown on medical marijuana. Just after Assemblymember Tom Ammiano and state Sen. Mark Leno denounced the bizarre move by the U.S. attorneys, Harris issued a weak, lame and overall pointless statement that shows she is unwilling to be a leader on this issue. The statement doesn't even appear on the front page of her website.

Here's what she has to say:

Harris said she was worried that “an overly broad federal enforcement campaign will make it more difficult for legitimate patients to access physician-recommended medicine in California.”

She urged federal authorities to make sure their enforcement efforts are focused on significant traffickers of illegal drugs.

Come on, Kamala. This is a blatant effort by the Obama Administration to overrule state law. It's an attack on an industry that creates jobs, pays taxes and helps sick people. It's another front in the failed War on (some) Drugs. And you're the chief law enforcement officer in the state of California, charged by the Constitution to defend state statutes, including Prop. 215. You can do a lot better than this.

Harris should have joined Ammiano and Leno at their press conference. She should have pointed out that the state is trying to regulate dispensaries, but the federal government has made that almost impossible by pulling this kind of shit.

And the most frustrating this is that Harris could actually make a difference here. What, exactly, is she hiding from? Does she think fighting the U.S. attorneys will make her look soft on drugs or crime and hurt her changes to be elected governor? Doesn't she realize that medical marijuana is really popular with the voters and that the anti-pot crowd is almost gone?

Dumb. Frustrating and dumb.

 

 

Comments

Gutless. She probably thinks she is going to replace Holder as Attorney General.

Posted by Guest Steelhead on Oct. 21, 2011 @ 11:50 am

This is a completely self-serving person. She has no concept of public service and she is a lawyer who doesn't believe in following the law. CA voters were warned and elected her anyway.

Posted by Guest on Oct. 21, 2011 @ 1:02 pm

"This is a blatant effort by the Obama Administration to overrule state law."

think prop 187

"And you're the chief law enforcement officer in the state of California, charged by the Constitution to defend state statutes, including Prop. 215. You can do a lot better than this."

think prop 8

qualifiers on my part on both. stop screaming.

The boat has long since sailed on federal power, often times to the lefts advantage. It is touching that you have tossed it out at this opportune moment.

The states county attorney doesn't have to do anything if it doesn't want to it seems.

Every one of your blog comments should lead with...

"Today is the first day of government and we have a lot of things to work out to our advantage."

Posted by meatsack on Oct. 21, 2011 @ 1:30 pm