Quan’s legal advisor: “Which side are we on?”

|
(6)
Police turned out in force in the streets of Oakland on Oct. 25
by Rebecca Bowe

The scene in Oakland was calm and peaceful around 9 p.m. last night as some 2,000 occupiers met in the amphitheater outside Oakland City Hall at Frank Ogawa Plaza. In sharp contrast with the war zone-like scene the previous evening, police did not mobilize to try and put a stop to the massive and highly organized general assembly meeting. Protesters have vowed to reconvene at 14th and Broadway at 6 p.m. every single day to continue organizing using a consenus process.

The night before, police in riot formations threatened “serious injury” if protesters did not disperse and assailed them with projectiles and blasts of teargas. But spirits were high as a fence blocking Frank Ogawa Plaza came down and the occupiers regrouped in the square, which they'd renamed Oscar Grant Plaza.

According to some news reports, Oakland Mayor Jean Quan had a change of heart. “Clearly, a decision was made last night not to involve the police,” Attorney Dan Siegel, a legal advisor to Quan, told the Guardian.

“My sense of things is that the city as a whole made a conclusion that it did not want to have another confrontation with Occupy Oakland.” Siegel said that when he was at City Hall in the early evening Oct. 26, before the General Assembly got underway, he was challenged by protesters who were angered by police actions the night before. “I said I didn’t agree with the decision of the police to break up the encampment,” he explained.

“I thought the police overreacted and committed actions of improper violence.”

In the heat of the confrontation, he even said he would think about resigning as Quan’s legal advisor.

But Siegel added that he hoped Quan was coming around. “I’ve been trying to convince her and others that there’s a different paradigm at issue here,” he said.

Instead of focusing on inconveniences and city ordinances about camping overnight in public parks, he said, Oakland could be taking the perspective that “we are really in a situation of crisis in the United States ... and the Occupy movement is a response to that. It is very likely to be a longstanding movement.”

He added that problems could be mitigated without involving police or using force. “As a city and as individuals, which side are we on?” Siegel said.

The Guardian sent messages to Quan’s office a short time ago to find out what the mayor’s intentions are regarding Occupy Oakland, whether instances of police violence are being investigated, and whether the city planned to meet with Occupy Oakland organizers. We haven’t yet heard back.

Comments

It cracked me up that so many bay area "progressives" were so worked up about rank choice voting when she won.

She is an an out of touch idiot and she will always be an out of touch idiot. She has no idea what is going on in the world around her and never has. You people crowed for a Sub-Reagan buffoon and called it awesome.

comical!

Posted by meatsack on Oct. 28, 2011 @ 1:37 am

I guarantee you that Mr. law-and-order Perata would have cracked down even harder than Quan's people did, and it's damned sure he never would have apologized and reversed his position.

So Quan's victory in the ranked choice election gave Oakland a mayor that actually -listened- to the people, learned from her mistake, and changed course.

Looks like successful ranked choice voting to me.

Posted by Eric Brooks on Oct. 28, 2011 @ 10:32 pm

Jordan's Oakland PD, unleashing other police and sheriffs to fire whatever at unarmed crowds, has to take the brunt of this, stop lying, and resign. If Quan is scapegoated, it only serves the thugs. Good for Siegal trying to mediate.

Jordan needs to be excoriated.The militarized police used the "least amount of force possible to protect themselves," as they lob a flash grenade at those coming to Scott Olsen's aid? Stop lying, leave office.

Jordan must resign and the officers who threw the grenade at Scott's rescuers tried for the crime.

Posted by Guest on Oct. 28, 2011 @ 9:27 pm

I cannot figure out what is going on with those of you that are advocating for Quan to save herself by throwing Jordan and/or Santana to the wolves. For carrying out an order she gave them? Really? This is the kind of ethical leadership you espouse?

Throwing people overboard for doing what you told them to do and then disavowed later on when it wasn't popular to save your own skin is *not progressive* okay?

It's scummy bullshit behavior and it shows that you cannot be trusted.

Siegel is not a mediator, he's a creep.

Talk about ... things I learned in kindgarten. It's just basic ethics, people.

Of course Quan must resign. If you think the only alternative is Perata, then you've got a crew loose. Try to use your imagination. Surely we can find a progressive who doesn't give former Marines skull fractures to protect the public safety, no?

Posted by Guest on Oct. 29, 2011 @ 11:02 am

I cannot figure out what is going on with those of you that are advocating for Quan to save herself by throwing Jordan and/or Santana to the wolves. For carrying out an order she gave them? Really? This is the kind of ethical leadership you espouse?

Throwing people overboard for doing what you told them to do and then disavowed later on when it wasn't popular to save your own skin is *not progressive* okay?

It's scummy bullshit behavior and it shows that you cannot be trusted.

Siegel is not a mediator, he's a creep.

Talk about ... things I learned in kindgarten. It's just basic ethics, people.

Of course Quan must resign. If you think the only alternative is Perata, then you've got a crew loose. Try to use your imagination. Surely we can find a progressive who doesn't give former Marines skull fractures to protect the public safety, no?

Posted by Guest on Oct. 29, 2011 @ 11:04 am

I cannot figure out what is going on with those of you that are advocating for Quan to save herself by throwing Jordan and/or Santana to the wolves. For carrying out an order she gave them? Really? This is the kind of ethical leadership you espouse?

Throwing people overboard for doing what you told them to do and then disavowed later on when it wasn't popular to save your own skin is *not progressive* okay?

It's scummy bullshit behavior and it shows that you cannot be trusted.

Siegel is not a mediator, he's a creep.

Talk about ... things I learned in kindgarten. It's just basic ethics, people.

Of course Quan must resign. If you think the only alternative is Perata, then you've got a crew loose. Try to use your imagination. Surely we can find a progressive who doesn't give former Marines skull fractures to protect the public safety, no?

Posted by Guest on Oct. 29, 2011 @ 11:04 am

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Related articles

  • Hearing today on bizarre Occupy Oakland stay-away order case

  • After the tear gas clears

    What are the lessons from the conflicts of the latest Occupy Oakland action?

  • Editor's notes

    Hey Oakland, maybe you should just hand over the Convention Center

  • Also from this author

  • Capitalizing on the Auld Mug

    Lawsuit alleges America's Cup organizers unfairly rejected African American sailing team and breached trustee duties by self-dealing

  • 12 arrested in raid of occupied Oakland home

  • iProtest

    The revolution will not be powered by smartphones (but these apps might help it along)