Kids smoke pot, don't drink

|
(10)

More American teens are smoking pot, and fewer are drinking alcohol, according to a new survey that's at the very least interesting and could be a push for policymakers to start thinking about how we regulate marijuana.

As the father of two kids, I'd like to start off by stipulating: High schoolers are going to try to alter their consciousness. They're also going to try to have sex. I did it, you did it, we all did it (well, we all drank and smoked pot. Some of us got laid and some of us didn't, but speaking personally, I can say that for those who didn't, it wasn't for lack of trying).

My sainted mother used to tell my brother and me that she'd rather have us hang out in the basement with our friends than go out and drive somewhere at night, and she never adhered to the Catholic doctrine of pretending kids shouldn't know about birth control. Her mantra: "As long as nobody gets pregnant or killed in a car accident, whatever you're doing can't be that bad." Which isn't such an awful parenting lesson.

And when it comes to getting pregnant or killed in a car accident, I'd say it's probably better that kids smoke pot than drink. Not saying either one is a great choice for a 16-year-old, just saying that drunk driving, blackouts etc. are a product of alcohol and that the risks of really bad outcomes from smoking pot are a bit lower.

But there's a larger point here, coming from the Marijuana Policy Project:

 “This report, once again, clearly demonstrates that our nation’s policymakers have their heads buried in the sand when it comes to addressing teen marijuana use,” said Rob Kampia, executive director of the Marijuana Policy Project.  “Political leaders have for decades refused to regulate marijuana in order to keep it out of the hands of drug dealers who aren’t required to check customer ID and have no qualms about selling marijuana to young people. The continued decline in teen tobacco and alcohol use is proof that sensible regulations, coupled with honest, and science-based public education can be effective in keeping substances away from young people. It’s time we acknowledge that our current marijuana laws have utterly failed to accomplish one of their primary objectives – to keep marijuana away from young people – and do the right thing by regulating marijuana, bringing its sale under the rule of law, and working to reduce the easy access to marijuana that our irrational system gives teenagers."

Yep: Education and intelligent regulation works. When I was in High School, I was one of the very few kids that didn't smoke cigarettes. Today, the number of teen smokers is much, much lower. And the new study says kids aren't drinking as much -- again, no doubt a result of health education and strict regulation.

So if harm reduction is the goal (and it ought to be), why aren't we legalizing and regulating pot?

 

 

Comments

making a comparison with booze isn't one of them. Booze is a structural and lubricating part of our society. And while pot makes people reclusive and paranoid, alcohol makes them confidant and sociable.

So while nobody enjoys an annoying drunk, everybody ignores a self-absorbed, spaced-out pothead.

Of course, Tim, we'd need to hear that you don't want to legalize pot purely so it can be managed and taxed by the government. I know you didn't mean that, right?

Posted by Anonymous on Dec. 14, 2011 @ 3:45 pm

The comparison between alcohol and pot is this: high people tend to space out on the couch while drunks get behind the wheel and kill people. It's safer.

Posted by Guest on Dec. 14, 2011 @ 9:31 pm

That's a total red herring -- no one is saying pot is REPLACING alcohol, so your awesome "social lubrication" would not be adversely affected. The coparisons are valid and proven. Besides, what's the harm in letting people sit on their couch at home while a little spaced out? News flash, there is no harm: plenty of people do that without the assistance of drugs already. Consistent management and taxation makes sense.

Posted by Guest on Dec. 15, 2011 @ 10:41 am

in itself a reason to legalize pot. The question has to be addressed it it's own terms.

The government is entitled to make a judgment about whether having millions of people "spaced out" is the kind of thing they want to officially support. It seems doubtful that they believe that.

And then of course there is a whole underworld of crime surrounding both gateway drugs like pot and the more serious stuff. Logistically it makes more sense to keep them all illegal.

Posted by Anonymous on Dec. 15, 2011 @ 11:04 am

Pot ought to be regulated and taxed just like alcohol and tobacco.

Posted by tim on Dec. 14, 2011 @ 4:09 pm

Can you point to a credible presidential candidiate adovcating the legalization of MJ? I can't. And it certainly isn't Obama.

Posted by Anonymous on Dec. 14, 2011 @ 4:34 pm

Hey Anonymous, how's that duodenum taste with your head way up there? And just how did you get it way up there? You must be the yoga master of asininity.
Obvi from your posts a day later, you have no idea what you are talking about and fall right in line with the BS arguments we've been hearing since it became illegal. The states have rights, it's why the Civil War was fought. If they wish to wise up and listen to the people, as they ought to, the percentages are going up no doubt, the Fed has no place in cracking down and penalizing, so it is NOT a federal issue. The federal issue is BSers like you make it so.

Posted by A Lamb on Dec. 15, 2011 @ 5:37 pm

Cool, because I think there's a bunch of States in the south that can't wait to ban abortion and reintroduce segregation.

Problem?

Posted by Anonymous on Dec. 15, 2011 @ 7:09 pm

But then ask them whether they want each State to control policies around race, immigration, abortion, gays etc. and they recoil in horror.

Hypocrites? Oh, surely not . . .

Posted by Guest on Dec. 15, 2011 @ 7:44 pm

what is this 'spaced out on the couch' bull shit? who says thats what happens when you smoke. the affects vary. laziness is not necessarily true for everyone.

Posted by Guest on Feb. 19, 2012 @ 10:51 pm

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Related articles

  • Why Wall Street loves the War on Drugs

  • Weed on wheels

    Delivery services and new dispensaries roll onto our annual Cannabis Club Guide update

  • A bad incentive for pot busts

  • Also from this author

  • $3,000 an hour -- is that fair?

  • A few problems with Facebook

  • The battle of 8 Washington

    Condos for millionaires approved with progressives split