Lackluster finish to case that made serious political charges

|
(9)
Cobra Solutions founder James Brady was disappointed by the jury verdict
Luke Thomas/Fog City Journal

A jury awarded the City and County of San Francisco $24,498 yesterday following its deliberations of a complicated civil case filed by the city in 2003 against a minority-owned computer services company accused of fraud and breach of contract, a company that countersued with a claim of being harmed by top city officials.

But that paltry sum and the jury's verdict of shared responsibility in failing to root out corruption in city government belied the more politically significant accusations made through depositions in the case that Mayor Ed Lee and former Mayor Willie Brown overrode city staff to give contracts to a “fraudulent” yet politically connected company, which proved to be a tangential issue that was left largely unexplored at trial.

In CCSF vs. Cobra Solutions, the jury found that both the city and Cobra Solutions failed in their responsibilities to prevent a former Department of Building Inspection information technology manager, Marcus Armstrong, from fraudulently bilking the city out of at least $482,000 between 1999 and 2001. An alleged Armstrong accomplice, Government Computer Sales, Inc. – which witnesses said Brown and Lee improperly certified, and which they say they don't remember – fled and was never brought to justice.

Cobra Solutions, which was awarded master contract status in 1998, was bound by a provision in its agreement with the city that required Cobra to “supervise” sub-contractors. The allegation of fraud against Cobra, however, was effectively dropped from the city’s complaint, but not until the end of the trial when consideration of fraud was omitted from the city’s closing arguments.

The award to the city was the difference between the monies paid by the city to Cobra Solutions ($269,739.93) and the monies paid by Cobra Solutions to Armstrong’s phony companies ($245,241.93), or the markup Cobra Solutions received from the city following the submission of several fraudulent invoices from two phony sub-contractor companies, Monarch Enterprises and Mindstorm technologies, set up by Armstrong.

Following the verdict announcement, a juror who did not want to be identified, said there wasn’t a single piece of evidence that was most compelling, but that, “the city proved its case. Cobra failed to prove its case.” The “vast majority” of jurors shared that opinion, the juror said. “It wasn’t even close.”

“The jury thought there was obviously a failure to supervise,” the juror continued. “[Cobra Solutions] took on work without even knowing who the party was that was working for them. Who was Monarch?”

Several invoices from Armstrong’s phony companies contained different addresses that the juror described as “a bit of a red flag.”

“If I’m in business, I’m not going to have someone working for me who I don’t know, and I’m not going to be paying them checks,” the juror said.

“The city also bore responsibility” in its failure to detect Armstrong’s kickback scheme, the juror said, mirroring the same sentiment echoed by then-City Controller Ed Harrington, who took the stand and conceded the city’s internal controls – as well as those of Cobra Solutions – failed to detect Armstrong’s kickback scheme.

Cobra had sought damages for breach of contract (the city’s failure to pay monies owed Cobra) and due process violations in connection with the city’s alleged debarment of Cobra from doing further business with the city.

“I’m disappointed,” said Cobra Solutions founder and president James Brady. “Life goes on. We’ll continue to move forward and repair our damaged reputation, raise our grandchildren, and focus on our families.”

Asked about the issue of sub-contractor supervision, Brady said, “I don’t think anybody could supervise a con man and the city was negligent in hiring this guy – they wouldn’t even bring him in the courtroom – so it’s just betrayal. And it’s a sad day that you hire con man and you won’t take any responsibility for his actions and you blame the small business. That’s not the American way.”

On the jurors finding that Cobra was not intentionally or defacto debarred from doing further business with the city, Brady said, “I think they got it wrong. I have no doubt about that.”

“The jury missed a lot of important facts,” said Mr. Brady’s wife, Deborah Brady, a co-founder of Telecon, the parent company of Cobra Solutions. The city had originally sued Telecon in its case-in-chief, but pursued no claims against Telecon at trial. “I don’t know how they missed them, but they missed them.”

Ms. Brady said the city gave another company, Desktop, the opportunity to defend itself against debarment, but “they never gave us that opportunity.”

“Judith Blackwell, she told the whole story in terms of Monique Zmuda saying they wanted us out, that we’re crooks,” Ms. Brady continued. “They accused us… and never gave us the opportunity to respond, ever.” Monique Zmuda is the deputy City Controller.

“I feel really betrayed by a city that I used to really love and [City Attorney] Dennis Herrera, who is our private attorney, betrayed us,” a tearful Ms. Brady said. “Ed Lee, who claims he barely knew us, betrayed us. Ed Harrington? I don’t know what that was all about, or Monique Zmuda… but Ed Lee and Dennis Herrera, they let down really good people who used to live in this city and loved this city and did all that we could to do good in the community and this city. “

“So I pretty much call it, ‘The City of Betrayal.’”

Cobra’s lead counsel in the case, Whitney Leigh, told us, “The jury made its decision. We’re concerned that the jury was allowed to find that Cobra could have breached the contract by refusing to submit to an audit by the City Attorney. So we believe there are some issues that need to be researched, so we’ll be looking at those issues.”

Asked if there would be post-trial motions, Leigh said, “Post trial motions and/or appeal.”

“Obviously we’re disappointed,” Leigh added, “but we’ll review the transcripts and see what options are available.”

Because of the possibility of an appeal, Herrera was unable to comment on the verdict or to discuss city’s costs in trying the case, said Herrera spokesperson Matt Dorsey.

 

Comments

I suppose the Bay Guardian has it's reporters busy on other things.

Posted by guest on Feb. 16, 2012 @ 10:48 pm

Although it's significance would most likely be hard for Project Censored Award jurors outside San Francisco or the Bay Area to understand.

Posted by Guest Ann Garrison on Feb. 17, 2012 @ 12:00 pm

With all respect to Luke, it was Rebecca Bowe who first broke the story (see "Dirty Business", Feb. 8. 2011). She did a phenomenal job of reporting on a very complicated case and making it accessible for the reader. Here's the link:

http://www.sfbg.com/2011/02/08/dirty-business

Not to take anything away from this piece (Luke's effort), which is a good follow-up to Rebecca's piece. But I believe in giving credit where due. It is laudable when reporters go out of their way to uncover corruption, whether by the government or big business. And sometimes it is the small, telling details that make for the most compelling stories. New York Times correspondent Anthony Shadidy, who passed away this week, said it best~

“I think the best journalism is sometimes about footnotes — when we write small to say something big.”

Posted by Lisa on Feb. 17, 2012 @ 5:03 pm

That's Anthony Shadid (not 'Shadidy'), who won two Pulitzer Prizes for his reporting on Iraq.

Posted by Guest on Feb. 17, 2012 @ 7:15 pm

I missed Rebecca Bowe's story when it came out.

Posted by Guest Ann Garrison on Feb. 18, 2012 @ 8:40 am

@Annie & Lisa, let us also not forget Daniela Kirshenbaum, who's 2006 article in FCJ "Pay To Play Bay Area" is an excellent primer on the corruption that permeates SF; also Sarah Phelan who did some excellent investigative reporting exposing the shennanigans that continue in Lennar's BVHP urban renewal. The names have not changed, the innocent still suffer and the guilty prosper. No meaningful official investigation has been done on any of the many 'irregularities', and probably never will be given their increasing control and manipulation of the 'law'.
If Bronstein is serious about trying to revive the Bay Citizen, he should consider hiring excellent reporters like those named above.
Just my thruppence.

Posted by Patrick Monk. RN on Feb. 18, 2012 @ 8:36 am

Yes, a most excellent primer on the corruption that permeates San Francisco politics: http://www.fogcityjournal.com/news_in_brief/kirshenbaum_061029.shtml

As I re-read it just now, this sentence jumped out at me, from the notes and corrections posted at the end:

"Paul Pelosi, Jr. is a loan officer, not a mortgage broker, for Countrywide, which is the largest home lender in the country."

One might have to have been following the mortgage meltdown to know that Countrywide was one of the worst offenders, that B of A's unwise purchase of Countrywide's toxic assets is the biggest thing dragging it under, or that one example of Countrywide's work was settled in a San Francisco courtroom, where the company was ordered to pay $8 million to an elderly widow with Alzheimer's who came close to losing her Pacific Heights home in one of their mortgage fraud scams.

Posted by Guest Ann Garrison on Feb. 19, 2012 @ 1:22 pm

Yes, a most excellent primer on the corruption that permeates San Francisco politics: http://www.fogcityjournal.com/news_in_brief/kirshenbaum_061029.shtml

As I re-read it just now, this sentence jumped out at me, from the notes and corrections posted at the end:

"Paul Pelosi, Jr. is a loan officer, not a mortgage broker, for Countrywide, which is the largest home lender in the country."

One might have to have been following the mortgage meltdown to know that Countrywide was one of the worst offenders, that B of A's unwise purchase of Countrywide's toxic assets is the biggest thing dragging it under, or that one example of Countrywide's work was settled in a San Francisco courtroom, where the lender was ordered to pay $8 million to an elderly widow with Alzheimer's who came close to losing her Pacific Heights home in one of their mortgage fraud scams.

Posted by Guest Ann Garrison on Feb. 19, 2012 @ 1:25 pm

@Pat & Annie,

Yes, Daniela did an outstanding job with that piece. I have posted the link to her piece several times myself. (I believe I swiped that from you, Pat ;-)

I confess that I was skeptical about the merits of this case, mainly because it penalizes the taxpayers, rather than the corrupt players who bilked us the first time around. I felt that until and unless someone presses criminal charges, it will be businesses as usual.

But I don't think the case was a total loss, nor completely "lacklaster". I noticed that the Chron finally picked up the story and I find that encouraging. I really think that it is the journalists, more than the lawyers, who do the greatest public good by shedding light on the "pay-to-play politics" which is how it goes in this town. So, the public is becoming aware of just how bad the corruption is. And this is a necessary, first step...
Perhaps now, other whistleblowers will come forth, the public will make demands, and we might rework the laws to punish those who engage in corrupt practices. But if it happens, it's going to be a long haul because the problem is so endemic...and not just at the local level, but nationally.

Ralph Nader gave a speech to Harvard law students recently, and it really brought home to me just how much we have lost in terms of our civil liberites since 2001...not to mention the toll on participatory democracy. As Nader said, we are just one or two terrorist attacks away from a total police state.

As he put it, "Illegal surveillance, violation of FISA Act, systemic signing statements, institutionalization of Constitutional criminality, secret law, secret evidence, imprisonment without charges, without lawyers, indefinite (detention)...this is America?"

He exhorted these Harvard students and legal professionals to stand up and fight back. As he said, it is not enough just to practice your profession as a trade while ignoring the larger political reality (the shredding of the Constitution and civil liberties). "The law writ large must be a compelling attention of all members of the legal profession if indeed we are a profession, as officers of the court, and not merely a well-compensated trade, astutely servicing and facilitating the dominant powers."

So, this is my challenge to men like Adachi, Gonzalez, Leigh...and every one of us. This is about more than one simple case of corruption. Democracy itself, the very soul of our nation, is on trial. If we would save it, we are all going to have to become activists.

Posted by Lisa on Feb. 19, 2012 @ 7:27 pm

Also from this author

  • Olague explains her support for RCV repeal measure

  • How business was done

    Mayor Lee testifies in corruption lawsuit that could cost the city $10 million