Perjury allegations against Lee gain more support

|
(126)
Aaron Peskin confirms conveying a job offer to Mirkarimi, allegedly from the Mayor's Office.
Luke Thomas/Fog City Journal

San Francisco Democratic Party Chair Aaron Peskin has confirmed his role in extending a city job offer from Mayor Ed Lee to Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi if Mirkarimi had been willing to resign in March, bolstering allegations that Lee may have committed perjury when testifying under oath before the Ethics Commission on Friday.

But even as more media outlets report the possible perjury (a story we broke first here), which is further complicating the already complicated official misconduct proceedings that Lee brought against Mirkarimi, the Mayor's Office and key Lee allies have refused to comment on the perjury allegations or the strange circumstances surrounding the alleged bomb threat that temporarily got Lee off the hot seat.

As we reported in this week's Guardian, Building Inspection Commissioner Debra Walker said Lee was lying when he said that he hadn't spoken with any members of the Board of Supervisors before charging Mirkarimi with official misconduct. Walker said Sup. Christina Olague told her she had spoken with Lee about the matter, which Olague now denies.

Lee also responded “absolutely not” when asked by Mirkarimi attorney Shephard Kopp whether he authorized Peskin or development consultant Walter Wong, a close Lee ally, “to convey to Sheriff Mirkarimi if he would stop down, you'd get him another job.”

At press time for this week's article, Peskin was backpacking in the Sierras and couldn't be reached, but he has now confirmed to the Guardian that he met with Wong at 11:30am on March 19 – just hours before Lee met with Mirkarimi to say he would be removed from office unless he resigned – at Cafe Trieste.

In that meeting, Peskin said Wong asked him to convey to Mirkarimi an offer from the mayor of a job with the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission or the Airport Commission if Mirkarimi would voluntarily resign. Asked whether Wong indicated that he had discussed the offer with the mayor, Peskin told us, “He certainly left me with that impression.”

Mirkarimi refused to accept the offer, insisting on fighting to keep his job, which was one factor in Peskin's subsequent public statement calling for Mirkarimi to resign. “There were a lot of things that factored into that,” Peskin said of his call for Mirkarimi to step down, although he wouldn't discuss other factors on the record.

Efforts by both the Guardian and the Examiner to reach Wong have been unsuccessful, and messages to the Mayor's Press Office on this and related issues also haven't been answered. But just as Walker has offered to do, Peskin said he's willing to testify under oath if asked.

“I am prepared, if subpoenaed, to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth,” Peskin told us.

Lee hasn't had any public events or made any public comments on the matter since the scandal broke on Friday. The other unanswered mystery is why Lee was whisked from the hearing room just 15 minutes into his testimony, shortly after making the statements that Walker alleges amounted to perjury.

As we reported, neither the SFPD nor the Sheriff's Department ordered the room evacuated, meaning that decision must have been made by someone within the Mayor's Office. Press Secretary Christine Falvey's last statement to the Guardian, on July 2, said, “Again, the mayor's office did not recess the meeting. I still have to refer you to the Police Department which maintains Mayor Lee's security or the Ethics Commission about the decision to recess the meeting for (I believe) about 90 minutes.”

Yet neither body seems to know who made the call, and follow-up questions asking the Mayor's Office to disclose any information they have about that decision have gone unanswered. District Attorney George Gascon -- whose office would need to pursue the perjury allegations considering the city's official misconduct rules don't apply to the mayor -- also didn't return our call asking generally how allegations of this fashion should be handled.

The official misconduct proceeding continue in front of the Ethics Commission on July 18 and 19 when Mirkarimi's wife, Eliana Lopez, is scheduled to testify. But that has also been complicated by the Mayor's Office's refusal to authorize payment for a plane ticket for Lopez to return from her native Venezuela to testify. Mirkarimi and his legal team say they can't afford to pay for that plane ticket after Lee suspended Mirkarimi without pay.

Comments

Because Debra Walker was not under oath.

Posted by marcos on Jul. 06, 2012 @ 7:39 pm

Lee and Olague's story is consistent.

So Walker is guilty of lying and trouble-making, but not perjury. There is no proof of perjury - only allegations made to try and take the ehat off Ross

Posted by Guest on Jul. 07, 2012 @ 6:40 am

Summarily adjudicating veracity and asserting motives, nice.

Posted by marcos on Jul. 07, 2012 @ 9:48 am

Tim Redmond wrote that we had discussed X, even though he wasn't there, and BOTH you and I denied discussing X then . . .

Would you say Tim would have credibility in saying that?

And particularly if you knew he was trying to discredit both of us?

Because that's the situation here.

Posted by Guest on Jul. 07, 2012 @ 2:56 pm

Depends on whatever I discussed with Tim about our chat.

Posted by marcos on Jul. 07, 2012 @ 3:42 pm

Maybe so he'd blab and discredit himself? Could work. Worked with Walker, who is looking even more discreditted now than when he got beat in D6.

If Olague had done wrong, she'd hardly lie to a blabmouth troublemaker like Walker unless she wanted to see Walker make a fool of herself.

Posted by Guest on Jul. 07, 2012 @ 3:58 pm

The allegation is that Lee did wrong by perjuring himself saying he hadn't talked to any supervisors.

Posted by Guest on Jul. 09, 2012 @ 7:10 am

any witnesses to any alleged conversations come forward.

All we have is one very biased bit player making second-hand claims about something she didn't witness.

Why would you give that any credibility?

Posted by Guest on Jul. 09, 2012 @ 8:14 am

makes them or they are otherwise damaging to progressives.

Posted by lillipublicans on Jul. 09, 2012 @ 9:16 am

This is a great example. The Guest makes the point that people are taking the word of Peskin and Walker as the absolute truth. Like they are Mandela or somebody like that.

So the response back is about Ivory Madison, which was just part of a case involving wrongdoing that Mirkarimi has admitted to.

I do realize that all progressives shouldn't be held accountable for @lilli's statements. Especially now that I have spoken to a friend of one his doctors who said that he got the impression that @lilli has stopped taking his meds. So that much has been proven.

Posted by Troll on Jul. 09, 2012 @ 9:41 am
Posted by Guest on Jul. 09, 2012 @ 10:53 am

and the cause is known. (Not the exact amount of force required, mind you, and many women bruise *quite* easily, so the arm grab -- though as stipulated was out-of-bounds act on Ross' part -- might have been far less violent than has been portrayed by some.)

What Ivory Madison alleged concerning previous arguments, etc. though -- now that is exactly the same as these accusations concerning the mayor. Why do the Mirkarimi haters believe one while deriding the other? Pure, unalloyed, wanton malice and lack of intellectual integrity.

Posted by lillipublicans on Jul. 09, 2012 @ 7:02 pm

Whereas before you opposed it?

Hypocrisy, thy name is Lilli.

Posted by Guest on Jul. 09, 2012 @ 7:20 pm

to in the slightest degree show that I do. Best evidence is best evidence.

In this case we have Mayor Lee saying one thing, and Aaron Peskin saying another. So it'll be up to the Ethics Commission to just have to get Wong and others in the witness box and make further inquiries... but oh, wait, Wong is in China with no plans to return... or wait, he's getting his newspaper in front of his house... or wait... wait...

You Rightie trolls crack me up "LOL." Always imputing the exact foul intellectual decay on others that you yourselves wear like pox.

Posted by lillipublicans on Jul. 11, 2012 @ 6:34 am

And yet strangely reluctant to accept Madison's.

Couldn't be political huh?

Posted by Guest on Jul. 11, 2012 @ 7:51 am
Posted by Patrick Monk RN on Jul. 07, 2012 @ 9:34 am

You are all out of your minds. Who cares. This is such nonsense.

Posted by Guest on Jul. 08, 2012 @ 10:32 pm

It's complicated and requires paying attention over a period of time. You just don't have any "staying" power.

Posted by Guest on Jul. 09, 2012 @ 7:12 am

What insterested people is WHY Ed Lee COMMITTED perjury?

Posted by Guest on Jul. 10, 2012 @ 3:22 pm

there isn't a shred of evidence for it that isn't hearsay by someone with an anti-Lee agenda.

Posted by Guest on Jul. 11, 2012 @ 7:52 am

San Franciscans have the right to question Walter Wong, as a business who had made his fortune from city contract, could POSE as government representative to interene government personal arrangement?

San Franciscans don't need a shadow mayor as Walter Wong!!

Posted by Guest on Jul. 10, 2012 @ 3:27 pm

Waggoner and Kopp are understandably focussed on the perjury charges, which they say would discount Lee's case against Mirkarimi, but isn't offering a City job in exchange for X, Y, or Z, or anything else against the law?

Posted by Guest Ann Garrison on Jul. 14, 2012 @ 11:26 am

our police chief became our DA. Or moving from SFMTA to Parks. Or from SFUSD to the libraries.

If everyone agrees, there's no problem, and it actually would have been the neatest solution to RossGate.

Posted by Guest on Jul. 14, 2012 @ 12:22 pm

"If everyone agrees, there's no problem..."

Yeah, it's called quid pro quo...the way that jobs were handed out under Willie Brown's administration. If it's not illegal, it should be.

Posted by Guest on Jul. 14, 2012 @ 1:40 pm
Posted by Guest on Jul. 14, 2012 @ 1:56 pm

Did Ed Lee lie, that's the issue.

Posted by Guest on Jul. 14, 2012 @ 2:49 pm

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.