The Chron has pretty much signed off on the inevitability of a giant set of tunnels moving water from the Sacramento River to the San Joaquin River, screwing up even futher the ecosystem of the San Francisco Bay and Delta:
The water world has already separated into three camps: the water contractors, the federal government, the governor and the state Department of Water Resources, which support the “conveyance” as a necessary part (but only one element) of providing future water supplies;
the environmental community, which does not speak with a single voice but, conceding that the $14 billion facility probably is inevitable, is focusing on how it might be operated.
The last group, the delta residents and the Northern California congressional delegation, is opposed, seeing a loss of water and productive farmland and little tangible benefit in return.
But let's remember: When this came up in 1982, it was voted down statewide, with something like 80 percent of Northern California saying "no." And it wasn't just the pumps and the Big Suck -- it was the whole concept of shifting more water to unsustainable agriculture in the desert. That point hasn't changed at all. Until we get a handle on why the state allows farmers to grow rice and tomatoes in the US version of Africa's Serenghetti, I don't see why we're spending a whole lot of money to make things worse.
Most Commented On
- Corporate welfare? Do you mean easing the tax burden on those - July 29, 2014
- marcos prefers Portland, apparently. - July 29, 2014
- Live Review: My Bloody Valentine’s SF show feels like - July 29, 2014
- But you thought Walker would be better - July 29, 2014
- Steven, it would be helpful if whenever a SFBG article advocates - July 29, 2014
- Shark long ago jumped. - July 29, 2014
- Uber’s secret, “proprietary” insurance policy leaked - July 29, 2014
- How to survive as an artist in SF's 'new economy' - July 29, 2014
- Corporate welfare - July 29, 2014
- i'm real curious about this - July 29, 2014