Ron Paul in queer Libertarian sex nonscandal

|
(3)

By Marke B.

rp0309a.jpg

Fine, yes, we're all wearing out our French tips awaiting Borat comic genius Sascha Baron Cohen's new Austrian thuper-gay fashion disaster epic flick, Bruno: Delicious Journeys Through America for the Purpose of Making Heterosexual Males Visibly Uncomfortable in the Presence of a Gay Foreigner in a Mesh T-Shirt -- and after a wee hits-reel preview at SXSW in Austin and a couple of test screenings deep in the bowels of Harvey Weinstein, the press is picking up on every juicy detail it can squeeze out of attendees.

Rp20309a.jpg

Like this tantalizing and/or vomit inducing piece just posted by Christopher Beam to Slate, in which one of the test screeners describes a near miss of giant-hairy-backed-dude-nude-wrestling proportions. In the Bruno movie, Cohen wheedles Libertarian leader and noted gerbil Ron Paul into an potentially compromising situation:

The scene with Paul, filmed in early 2008, occurs about halfway through the movie, after Bruno gets the idea that you have to make a sex tape to become famous. (Stop reading here if you want to see the movie unspoiled.)

Cut to a nondescript hotel suite where Bruno sits across from Ron Paul. After a brief exchange of pleasantries, a light blows out on the set. Bruno apologizes for the technical difficulties and suggests that he and Paul wait in the other room while the crew fixes the light.

The other room, it turns out, is a bedroom. The lighting is low, and the film is now grainy—not unlike a sex tape—as it cuts to a hidden spy camera. There's a spread of Champagne and strawberries and caviar on a table.

Bruno tells Paul to make himself comfortable. Paul sits down on the bed. Bruno turns on some music and starts dancing. Paul is visibly uneasy but doesn't say anything at first. He picks up a newspaper and pretends to read it. "You can tell at each weird gay detail, he [chalks] it up to, This guy is European," says one of the attendees.

Finally, Paul asks what's going on. "Don't worry about it, Dr. Paul," says Bruno, who then unbuckles his belt and drops his pants. At that point, Paul snaps up and storms out of the room.

As Paul is walking away, you can hear him say, several times, something like, "This guy is a queer!" "The word queer comes out of his mouth three or four times," says an attendee.

bruno031609a.jpg
Hey Bruno -- leotards, not Libertarians!

Hilarious, yes, and, according to Beam, Paul's press secretary Rachel Mills confirms that he was in the movie, but ducked when asked about the details. And when asked about the "This guy is a queer" part?

Mills, who was present at the taping, did elaborate on the "queer" line. "I heard him say 'weird,' " she wrote in an e-mail. "In any case, Queer Eye for the Straight Guy, Queer as Folk … it's not exactly a shocking term if that's what he did say."

Um. message to straight people (even libertarians): There's a difference between "queer" and "a queer."

"Queer" is something we'll deign to let you use to refer to something adjectivally, such as, "Wow, you're really hot for a queer activist," or, "I didn't know this bar was queer until I shoved my dick through the gloryhole."

"A queer," however, means you are probably wearing Confederate flag-printed Depends underneath your Klan robe. Or else you think Brad Paisley means it when he sings about girls.

A metaphor for out-of-touchness? Just sayin'.

Comments

Poor Dr. Paul, he's a septuagenarian republican from Texas. I'm surprised he didn't slam trough the wall leaving nothing but a Ron Paul shaped hole behind him.

Posted by Brenden S on Mar. 17, 2009 @ 7:34 am

About time somebody cleared the difference between "queer" and "a queer"!
And nailing one of those Confederate flag-printed Depends types, sweet!
Can't wait to hear the denial on the 'something-like' quote!!! HAHAHA!
He said something like the guy was queer or a queer, lol!
And finally, homosexuals being portrayed in a positive light on the silver screen.
Hope in America. :)

Posted by privateIdaho on Mar. 17, 2009 @ 8:31 pm
Art

Ron Paul is not a libertarian. He's ultraconservative republican (remember he ran as a *republican*!). This is the same guy that wants to ban abortions and have government legislate who can marry whom. This goes against libertarian principals of keeping government out of our personal lifes. I'm offended that Ron Paul associates himself with libertarian party.

Posted by Art on Mar. 19, 2009 @ 7:48 pm

Also from this author

  • Brilliant exodus

    Arthur Szyk's 1930s Haggadah packs fresh visual punch.

  • Ketchup

  • Saving Yosemite